Reductionist Arguments Explaining Neath-death Experiences (NDEs) and OBEsProviding a scientific explanation for the phenomenon of near-death experience has been a difficult challenge for scientists ever since data in the form of NDE testimonials started appearing in the mid 1970s. Some of the scientific arguments against the validity of NDEs (i.e., that they are only hallucinations) are also applicable to out-of-body experiences in general since out-of-body experiences are an important component of most NDEs. When examining the Near-death experience, we might first ask the
question, "Why did the NDE concept emerge when it did?" As NDEs became better known, psychologists, physiologists, and neurologists began looking for ways to account for NDEs using physical and medical explanations. Reducing complex psychological phenomena to simpler material laws and processes is a primary occupation of scientists. The goal is to explain away the supernatural, and reduce it to physical causes such as brain chemistry (neural noise, hypoxia, etc.), psychological states (wish fulfillment or reliving the birth trauma), and sociological factors (religious fantasies based on social conditioning). The scientist's refusal to accept supernatural explanations for natural phenomena has in general been very advantageous for society, and resulted in many of the advances in material comfort that we see today. Their skepticism is therefore something to be praised and makes a valuable contribution to the world we live in. However, when it comes to investigating the events and
experiences which occur on the borders of life and death, their
standard assumptions and methodologies become somewhat problematic.
As with scientific attempts to describe the origins and fundamental
makeup of matter or how objects behave at or beyond the speed of
light, seemingly implausible or contradictory claims lead to
questioning the basic premises of science when investigating
borderline or liminal areas. Such areas of investigation as
Near-death experience or subatomic matter seem to defy the clear
explanations and rational analysis that are so fruitful in the other
more common domains of scientific inquiry. See Full Article: SPIRITUAL TRAVEL.ORG |